The Myth of Human Progress

5 06 2016

After reading this excellent article, you will know why I admire Chris Hedges so much……

Posted on Jan 13, 2013 on the Truthdig website





By Chris Hedges

chrishedgesClive Hamilton in his “Requiem for a Species: Why We Resist the Truth About Climate Change” describes a dark relief that comes from accepting that “catastrophic climate change is virtually certain.” This obliteration of “false hopes,” he says, requires an intellectual knowledge and an emotional knowledge. The first is attainable. The second, because it means that those we love, including our children, are almost certainly doomed to insecurity, misery and suffering within a few decades, if not a few years, is much harder to acquire. To emotionally accept impending disaster, to attain the gut-level understanding that the power elite will not respond rationally to the devastation of the ecosystem, is as difficult to accept as our own mortality. The most daunting existential struggle of our time is to ingest this awful truth—intellectually and emotionally—and continue to resist the forces that are destroying us.

The human species, led by white Europeans and Euro-Americans, has been on a 500-year-long planetwide rampage of conquering, plundering, looting, exploiting and polluting the Earth—as well as killing the indigenous communities that stood in the way. But the game is up. The technical and scientific forces that created a life of unparalleled luxury—as well as unrivaled military and economic power—for the industrial elites are the forces that now doom us. The mania for ceaseless economic expansion and exploitation has become a curse, a death sentence. But even as our economic and environmental systems unravel, after the hottest year in the contiguous 48 states since record keeping began 107 years ago, we lack the emotional and intellectual creativity to shut down the engine of global capitalism. We have bound ourselves to a doomsday machine that grinds forward, as the draft report of the National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory Committee illustrates.

Complex civilizations have a bad habit of destroying themselves. Anthropologists including Joseph Tainter in “The Collapse of Complex Societies,” Charles L. Redman in “Human Impact on Ancient Environments” and Ronald Wright in “A Short History of Progress” have laid out the familiar patterns that lead to systems breakdown. The difference this time is that when we go down the whole planet will go with us. There will, with this final collapse, be no new lands left to exploit, no new civilizations to conquer, no new peoples to subjugate. The long struggle between the human species and the Earth will conclude with the remnants of the human species learning a painful lesson about unrestrained greed and self-worship.

“There is a pattern in the past of civilization after civilization wearing out its welcome from nature, overexploiting its environment, overexpanding, overpopulating,” Wright said when I reached him by phone at his home in British Columbia, Canada. “They tend to collapse quite soon after they reach their period of greatest magnificence and prosperity. That pattern holds good for a lot of societies, among them the Romans, the ancient Maya and the Sumerians of what is now southern Iraq. There are many other examples, including smaller-scale societies such as Easter Island. The very things that cause societies to prosper in the short run, especially new ways to exploit the environment such as the invention of irrigation, lead to disaster in the long run because of unforeseen complications. This is what I called in ‘A Short History of Progress’ the ‘progress trap.’ We have set in motion an industrial machine of such complexity and such dependence on expansion that we do not know how to make do with less or move to a steady state in terms of our demands on nature. We have failed to control human numbers. They have tripled in my lifetime. And the problem is made much worse by the widening gap between rich and poor, the upward concentration of wealth, which ensures there can never be enough to go around. The number of people in dire poverty today—about 2 billion—is greater than the world’s entire population in the early 1900s. That’s not progress.”

“If we continue to refuse to deal with things in an orderly and rational way, we will head into some sort of major catastrophe, sooner or later,” he said. “If we are lucky it will be big enough to wake us up worldwide but not big enough to wipe us out. That is the best we can hope for. We must transcend our evolutionary history. We’re Ice Age hunters with a shave and a suit. We are not good long-term thinkers. We would much rather gorge ourselves on dead mammoths by driving a herd over a cliff than figure out how to conserve the herd so it can feed us and our children forever. That is the transition our civilization has to make. And we’re not doing that.”

Wright, who in his dystopian novel “A Scientific Romance” paints a picture of a future world devastated by human stupidity, cites “entrenched political and economic interests” and a failure of the human imagination as the two biggest impediments to radical change. And all of us who use fossil fuels, who sustain ourselves through the formal economy, he says, are at fault.

Modern capitalist societies, Wright argues in his book “What Is America?: A Short History of the New World Order,” derive from European invaders’ plundering of the indigenous cultures in the Americas from the 16th to the 19th centuries, coupled with the use of African slaves as a workforce to replace the natives. The numbers of those natives fell by more than 90 percent because of smallpox and other plagues they hadn’t had before. The Spaniards did not conquer any of the major societies until smallpox had crippled them; in fact the Aztecs beat them the first time around. If Europe had not been able to seize the gold of the Aztec and Inca civilizations, if it had not been able to occupy the land and adopt highly productive New World crops for use on European farms, the growth of industrial society in Europe would have been much slower. Karl Marx and Adam Smith both pointed to the influx of wealth from the Americas as having made possible the Industrial Revolution and the start of modern capitalism. It was the rape of the Americas, Wright points out, that triggered the orgy of European expansion. The Industrial Revolution also equipped the Europeans with technologically advanced weapons systems, making further subjugation, plundering and expansion possible.

“The experience of a relatively easy 500 years of expansion and colonization, the constant taking over of new lands, led to the modern capitalist myth that you can expand forever,” Wright said. “It is an absurd myth. We live on this planet. We can’t leave it and go somewhere else. We have to bring our economies and demands on nature within natural limits, but we have had a 500-year run where Europeans, Euro-Americans and other colonists have overrun the world and taken it over. This 500-year run made it not only seem easy but normal. We believe things will always get bigger and better. We have to understand that this long period of expansion and prosperity was an anomaly. It has rarely happened in history and will never happen again. We have to readjust our entire civilization to live in a finite world. But we are not doing it, because we are carrying far too much baggage, too many mythical versions of deliberately distorted history and a deeply ingrained feeling that what being modern is all about is having more. This is what anthropologists call an ideological pathology, a self-destructive belief that causes societies to crash and burn. These societies go on doing things that are really stupid because they can’t change their way of thinking. And that is where we are.”

And as the collapse becomes palpable, if human history is any guide, we like past societies in distress will retreat into what anthropologists call “crisis cults.” The powerlessness we will feel in the face of ecological and economic chaos will unleash further collective delusions, such as fundamentalist belief in a god or gods who will come back to earth and save us.

“Societies in collapse often fall prey to the belief that if certain rituals are performed all the bad stuff will go away,” Wright said. “There are many examples of that throughout history. In the past these crisis cults took hold among people who had been colonized, attacked and slaughtered by outsiders, who had lost control of their lives. They see in these rituals the ability to bring back the past world, which they look at as a kind of paradise. They seek to return to the way things were. Crisis cults spread rapidly among Native American societies in the 19th century, when the buffalo and the Indians were being slaughtered by repeating rifles and finally machine guns. People came to believe, as happened in the Ghost Dance, that if they did the right things the modern world that was intolerable—the barbed wire, the railways, the white man, the machine gun—would disappear.”

“We all have the same, basic psychological hard wiring,” Wright said. “It makes us quite bad at long-range planning and leads us to cling to irrational delusions when faced with a serious threat. Look at the extreme right’s belief that if government got out of the way, the lost paradise of the 1950s would return. Look at the way we are letting oil and gas exploration rip when we know that expanding the carbon economy is suicidal for our children and grandchildren. The results can already be felt. When it gets to the point where large parts of the Earth experience crop failure at the same time then we will have mass starvation and a breakdown in order. That is what lies ahead if we do not deal with climate change.”

“If we fail in this great experiment, this experiment of apes becoming intelligent enough to take charge of their own destiny, nature will shrug and say it was fun for a while to let the apes run the laboratory, but in the end it was a bad idea,” Wright said.




11 responses

5 06 2016

Yes, Chris Hedges is a brilliant, Pulitzer Prize winning journalist and author. I often listen to his very insightful podcasts on the Real News Network. He is shortly to start a new tv interview program on RT America.

5 06 2016

In my 20’s I was aware of the world’s problems and “progressive” in my views. My wife and I migrated to Tasmania with our infant daughter. We wanted to give her the best chance to grow up healthy and happy away from the pollution and corruption of the “old world”. In my 70’s I have become aware of how little I have done to avert the global catastrophes that will blight the lives of my grandchildren.

I guess some old Sumerian granddad gazing out over the once lush gardens and orchards of his sophisticated city felt much the same way. The difference is that his grandchildren still had the chance to migrate to pastures new. That is no longer an option, unless you buy the fantasy of colonising Mars.

6 06 2016

Hi Phil, Other than wisely moving to Tasmania, there’s not too much you could have done to avert the catastrophes facing your grandkids. The forces responsible have been just too powerful for well over a century. Even today, unbelievably, the majority of ordinary people still don’t want to know…

6 06 2016
Chris Harries

The vast majority, Even many who’ve an inkling of the human predicament pursue false hopes.

Cognitive dissonance does not just afflict some people, to a great extent it is hard wired into us. If we really believed sonf cited upon Chris and Hamilton’s thesis then we wouldn’t live out our lives as we do.

5 06 2016
42degrees S

The real scary thing is I now recognize the awful “positive speak” coming out of our politicians mouths for what it is.The “jobs and growth” and the acceptance, indeed insistence, by the vast numbers of people that it eventuate. There seems no appetite to slow the the super tanker down let alone turn it around and anyone daring to suggest otherwise are labeled traitors to the economic cause that almost everyone subscribes to.

Similar ludicrous arguments are used for the continued extraction and export of coal to address poverty in the developing world, followed by statements such as our coal is environmentally better than coal exported from other parts of the world as if this will matter a jot when the climate decides to call in its cards. This sort of Goebbels speak goes unchallenged except by the minority on the saner side of the debate.

Being a “baby boomer” I too feel like philgorman above, that I have been asleep during a period of immense profligacy but I only woke up to become aware of the environmental mess we were getting into when I was in my 40’s.

This awareness must now be spread using every means possible, letters to the editor, blogs like this, by one on one conversations at every opportunity so that, to use the analogy of the blue tits and the gold top milk bottle in England, communication may reach a critical point before those oft mentioned tipping points arrive.

18 06 2016
Chris Harries

I think more and more people are developing awareness about the depth of the global situation, even if the main response for many of those is to feel hopeless and depressed. On the other hand the unabashed ‘Jobs and Growth’ slogan shows us how much more deeply endless growth is embedded in the collective psyche. I come across excited blogs every day … about advancements such as autonomous cars and 3D printers and such. These are like bait that wet the appetite for more and keep the consumer dream alive.

The second technology I find most fascinating. A device that promises us a means to fulfil any consumer lust with the simple press of a few buttons…. bingo, and out it pops. Like magic. Gotta have one of those!!

Even more interesting is that many on the progressive side of these debates often get waylayed by these technology debates, even putting forward arguments about how these futuristic technologies may reduce consumption of resources and so forth – as if new technology is the key to radical social change.

5 06 2016
42degrees S

Mike, have you thought to repost your blog on FaceBook? Might it be way to get it out to a wider audience?
Do you have any other way to get in touch with you than via this way?

5 06 2016

Every post is automatically broadcast on Facebook, and this one has been widely shared…..

6 06 2016

Hedges is certainly an excellent wordsmith and entertaining read – he “gets” A LOT of things… but critically, he falters on his politics. As a progressive liberal, he still thinks our predicament could be fixed by the people through “democratic processes”, if those pesky elites would just get out of the way.

Whereas the anarchistic kids in in the occupy movement knew the only chance humanity has of stopping this machine is to destroy it… actually, physically, violently. But Hedges, in typical neo-liberal style, denounced them and their actions… they weren’t part of his movement, his red brigade!

And so ironically, Chris himself falls prey to the belief that if certain rituals are performed all the bad stuff will go away. Talk about clinging to irrational delusions !

20 06 2016

Historically violent revolutions merely replace one anti-human ideology with another; one evil oppressive regime with another. Be careful what you wish for.

6 07 2016

“Anti-human ideology”? Name one of historical significance… I’m pretty sure they’ve all been rather anthropocentric! Abrahamic Religion’s, Imperialism, Capitalism, Communism, etc…

Perhaps you mean’t authoritarian ideology? Indeed, authoritarian structures (kingdoms, empires, reigemes, governemnts, etc.) have historically suceeded one another. But amidst the chaos there were those who resisted… the Anarchist Movement within The First International, the Revolutionary Insurrectionary Army of Ukraine, the Spanish and Italian Anarchists, the Mohawk’s of Kanesatake, indigenous resistance in our very own frontier wars, to the Murray Bookchin inspired Kurdish resistance of today.

These are the people and ideas I admire and wish for with great clarity. A world without gods, without masters… where everybody has equal power.

I think the greatest problem today is that most people (including myself not that long ago) dont know or think deeply enough about what they wish for, what their politic is?

Tell me Phil… what do you wish for, what is your politic, what kind of world do you dream of?

Here’s some inspiriation from a man who in my humble opinion had a very ‘sorted’ 🙂 world view…

Mikhail Bakunin –
“Even if god did exist it would be necessary to overthrow him.”
“Mankind has allowed itself to be governed long enough, too long, the origin of its unhappiness does not reside in this or that form of government but in the very fact and principle of goverment, whatever kind it may be.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s